Transcending dualism in public administration

**An edited version of this article was published in the September 2011 issue of the Penang Economic Monthly.

The old Greek philosophy has a famous law, the law of non-contradiction which says, a thing cannot be its opposite in the same time space continuum. In plain English, this  is what we call “Either..or” thinking, or in plainer English, a durian cannot be at the same time a mangosteen.

While many of us may not know this law by name, we are often it’s faithful adherents. This is more so for politicians. Politics today, especially in Malaysia, has become painfully partisan. You are either in Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat, you are either an UMNO muslim or a PAS muslim, you are either with us or against us. The middle ground, like Atlantis of old, seemed to have submerged into oblivion.

But is all hope lost?

Enter Georg Fredrich Hegel, an early 19th century German philosopher who decided that the old “either…or” logic may not be true all the time. He acknowledged that there will always be opposing views, but concluded that this need not necessarily lead to an “either…or” situation. In plain English, while there are opposites, there is always a middle ground of concession. If we look hard enough, in life, this is almost always true. Take for example, the idea of government; the question of who should administer the society. On one hand, we have the platonic idea of the know-it-all king who rule as a wise dictator, and on the other hand, a free state where everyone do what is right in their own eyes. We somehow prefer a middle-ground compromise found in the idea of democracy, where the people (everyone) choose the leader or leaders they think suitable to rule. This process of finding middle ground is sometimes called a Hegelian dialectic in honour of our German philosopher.

This is what we need most in our highly partisan politics today.

Perhaps in such dichotomised politics as ours, it is best to start this hegelian dialectic by focusing on certain problems within our society. My own proposal is to start by looking at the civil service. The current Federal-State political differences should be an opportunity to adopt a hegelian dialectic, to look into the strength and weaknesses of both political ideals in regards to the civil service and to bring forth a better, more efficient public delivery system.

A very good place to begin this process of dialectical reform is in the local government. For example, while the Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai (Seberang Perai Municipal Council) of which I am councillor, is formed by a Federal legistlation, the council is bound bound by the same legislation to adhere to the directions set by the State Government. Again, by while the staff of the council, including the Mayor, are appointed by the Federal Government through the Public Service Department (Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam), councillors, who are responsibility for the overall policy of the council are appointed by the State Government. With such arrangement, if we take an “either…or” position, then not only the council will be paralysed by extreme division, the whole municipality suffers due to a divided local government. There is of course, always the choice to go the hegelian way, to leverage on the strength from both the Federal and the State government and bringing forth a synthesis, better than each divided and on their own.

If we really aspire to create a two-party system and build a more vibrant democracy, then perhaps we should start giving marks for bi-partisan collaborations, not just for individual performances of our political parties. A healthy democracy requires both the Government and the Opposition to be able to look beyond political divide in order to uphold national interest. Recent development in USA demonstrated the adverse effect of blind political partisanship. The deadlock in US debt debate due to widening political gap between the two major parties in the Congress has affected the credit worthiness of the country for the first time in 70 years. Too much politicking can really affect the economy, even for the USA.

I am not asking us to throw away the law of non-contradiction, because when we cross the road, the car is either heading our way or not heading our way and we have to make a choice. But when it comes to durians and mangosteens, maybe it is wise to listen to the old wisdom, eat some of both; because durians may be delicious, but it is also “heaty” and you need the cooling mangosteens to regulate the heatiness.

(Image source: the Internet)


		

About stevensim

www.about.me/stevensim

Posted on September 4, 2011, in Philosophy, Politics, Society and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: